Asuquo vs YPP, Andy & OBA:Serial errors, self-contradiction shame Asuquo in court

*admits to committing blunders

An absurd drama ensued at the Federal High Court in Uyo on Friday as Alexander Asuquo Esq., the applicant in the suit challenging the governorship candidacy of Senator Bassey Albert in the Young Progressives Party (YPP), was cross examined.

Asuquo Esq. who had earlier adopted his statement on oath as his evidence in chief, was clearly fumbled when asked pertinent questions relating to the matter.

Represented by N. C. Ikono Esq., Asuquo had earlier alleged that YPP State Chairman, Apostle Nyeneime Andy violated the YPP constitution by vying for governorship without resigning as state chairman.
However, on cross examination, when asked to point at the section of the constitution, he could not.

When lead counsel to Andy, C. N. Nwigwe queried his membership of the YPP because he failed to attach his membership card to the case file, he said he forgot and apologized saying, "it was an oversight on our part."

"And you are a lawyer, quite serious," Justice A. A. Okeke retorted.

On his attempt to challenge the eligibility of Senator Bassey Albert as candidate of the party, he was asked if he was aware that Apostle Andy officially withdrew from the race, a situation which led to the conduct of another primaries on June 1st, 2022.
On this, he said such exercise did not hold, but later contradicted himself by saying that it held but was marred by irregularities.
Clerk of the court intervened to restore calm as the court erupted in laughter following his response.

Counsel to YPP,  E. N. Akpabio argued that Asuquo has no business challenging the conduct of the primaries since he neither procured the YPP governorship nomination and expression of interest forms nor participated in the primaries. Responding, he alleged that the party barred him from purchasing the form.

His claim that he joined YPP because of its impressive ideology was challenged when attention was drawn to his written statement that he instantly made up his mind to join after seeing the official phone line of YPP on the website of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

Counsel also challenged the authenticity of documents tendered by the plaintiff on grounds that all are vague and computer generated, insisting that they violate the Evidence Act.

Defendants' legal teams however shelved further objections till the final address.

The case was adjourned to September 19, 2022 for adoption of written addresses.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Akwa Ibom Stakeholders reject Water Resources Bill

Akan Okon vs. Umo Eno: Prof Jideoni petitions security agencies against blogger for libel

We're doing quality dualization work on Calabar-Itu Highway - SEMARTECH